Digital Geopolitical Battlefield: How Operation Sindoor Ignited an Information War

India’s launch of Operation Sindoor has ignited simultaneous battles across social media platforms. Following the Pahalgam terror attack that killed 26 civilians, India conducted strikes against terrorist infrastructure inside Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir. This military response triggered massive digital campaigns, as Blackbird.AI’s analysis reveals, which included anomalous activity, state-sponsored messaging, and highly coordinated narrative deployment.

Our analysis identified over 180,000 posts that generated more than 3 million engagements across competing narratives. The data reveals sophisticated information operations with clear coordination patterns, bot amplification, and state support. High anomaly rates—33.9% around certain narratives—indicate orchestrated campaigns rather than organic conversations. These operations aim to shape public perceptions regarding the responsibility for attacks, the legitimacy of military action, and Kashmir’s territorial status.

Key Competing Narratives

Blackbird.AI identified six major narrative clusters driving the information conflict:

1. Operation Sindoor as Justified Response

Volume: 111,000+ posts, 388,000+ engagements Anomalous Activity: 33.7% Key Actors: Indian government accounts (10% of posts)

The Indian government characterized Operation Sindoor as a “precise and restrained response” to the Pahalgam attack. Constellation network analysis identified Indian state accounts—including military branches, defense ministry, and government officials—as central nodes driving this narrative. These accounts exhibited largely non-anomalous patterns, whereas accounts at the network periphery displayed higher anomalous activity indicators.

2. Pakistan as a Terrorist State

Volume: 25,000+ posts, 1.5 million+ engagements
Anomalous Activity: 33.9% Key Metric: 93% of #PakistanIsATerrorState posts flagged as anomalous

This inflammatory narrative claimed direct Pakistani involvement in the Pahalgam attack, generating the highest engagement-to-post ratio among all narratives analyzed. The campaign combined emotional appeals about civilian casualties with accusations against Pakistani leadership. Additional hashtags appeared designed to justify further military action beyond the initial operation.

3. India as Unprovoked Aggressor

Volume: 8,600+ posts, 475,000+ engagements
Anomalous Activity: 13.8% Key Actors: Macro-influencers (6% of posts)

This counter-narrative claimed no evidence linked Pakistan to the Pahalgam attack, framing India’s strikes as “entirely preemptive and unprovoked.” Several high-profile accounts amplified claims about “false flag” operations and alleged Indian aggression. This narrative establishes parallels between Kashmir and other global conflicts, particularly those in Palestine.

4. Kashmir Territorial Dispute

Volume: Combined 8,000+ posts, 458,000+ engagements across positions
Bot-like Activity: 11.5-15.9% Key Subclusters:

• “Kashmir belongs to India” (2,000 posts, 38,000 engagements)
• “Kashmir should be independent” (6,000 posts, 420,000 engagements)

The independence narrative gained significant traction, with network analysis revealing a sophisticated deployment of hashtags designed to boost visibility. Posts promoting Kashmiri independence often framed the conflict as two nuclear powers fighting over territory that wanted neither of them. The messaging emphasized the human cost while advocating autonomous decision-making for Kashmir.

5. Imminent War Escalation

Volume: 6,500+ posts, 261,000+ engagements
Bot-like Activity: 18.5% (highest among all narratives) Anomalous Posts: 20.1%

When Pakistan’s defense minister suggested an Indian military incursion was imminent, the statement triggered widespread fear-based engagement. A parallel narrative claiming India would “inflict a comprehensive military defeat on Pakistan” within “2-14 days” showed a strong state supporter presence. Network analysis revealed a concentration of bot accounts around influencers who position themselves as anti-censorship advocates.

6. Ceasefire Violations

Volume: 24,000+ posts, 1.5 million+ engagements
Anomalous Activity: 13.3% Key Actors: Indian state supporters (highest representation)

This narrative focused on alleged Pakistani violations of existing ceasefire agreements in Kashmir. The high engagement metrics indicate significant public interest in border security developments that could trigger broader conflict.

Operation Sindoor: The Catalyst

The initial military operation catalyzed this information warfare explosion. Official Indian government messaging emphasized surgical precision and justified retaliation against terrorist infrastructure. This narrative received additional amplification from patriotic pro-India users not directly affiliated with the government but showing coordinated behavior patterns.

Blackbird.AI’s Constellation analysis mapped intricate networks of accounts, revealing how information flowed from official sources through influencer accounts and ultimately to broader audiences. Red nodes in our visualization identify anomalous activity concentration, particularly around inflammatory hashtags that spread through apparent coordination rather than organic sharing.

Cross-Platform Coordination

While initial posts about Operation Sindoor appeared on social media, coordinated campaigns quickly spread across multiple platforms. Blackbird.AI detected evidence of cross-platform coordination, with narrative fragments reappearing on social media networks within hours of initial deployment.

This multi-platform approach maximized reach while complicating tracking efforts. Several hashtags demonstrated platform-specific mutations designed to evade moderation while maintaining core messaging. The hashtag campaign exemplifies this approach, with slight variations appearing across platforms but maintaining identical framing and evidence presentation.

Role of Verified Accounts

Verified accounts played a crucial role in legitimizing narratives. Indian state accounts, which were verified, provided authenticity markers that non-verified accounts leveraged when resharing content.

Several verified journalism accounts participated in narrative amplification, particularly around the initial announcement of Operation Sindoor. Blackbird.AI analysis suggests these accounts functioned as “narrative laundering” vehicles, providing seemingly independent validation for state-preferred framing.

This dynamic created significant challenges in media literacy. Casual observers encountering these narratives would see verification indicators that typically signal credibility despite underlying coordination patterns.

Bot Network Activity

Bot detection metrics showed significant variation across narratives. War escalation content displayed the highest bot-like activity (18.5%), indicating the potential artificial amplification of fear-inducing content. The Kashmir independence narrative showed moderate bot activity (15.9%), while the Pakistan terrorist state narrative exhibited lower bot metrics but higher human-coordinated anomalous posting.

Blackbird.AI’s Constellation network visualization revealed bot clusters primarily organized around specific hashtags rather than accounts, indicating sophisticated automation designed to boost topic visibility rather than targeting specific messengers. This strategy effectively manipulated platform algorithms to increase narrative exposure while maintaining the appearance of organic conversation.

Sentiment Analysis Trends

Sentiment analysis across narratives revealed stark emotional differences. Pro-India narratives demonstrated high anger metrics (38% above baseline) while emphasizing justice and security. Counter-narratives showed elevated fear indicators (29% above baseline) while emphasizing victimhood and aggression.

The Kashmir independence conversation displayed a complex sentiment profile, combining sympathy, frustration, and hope metrics that fluctuated in response to current events. This narrative showed the most significant emotional variance, suggesting less centralized message discipline.

War escalation content consistently showed high fear and anticipation metrics, regardless of the country users supported. This indicates effective emotional manipulation techniques designed to drive engagement through anxiety.

LEARN: What Is Narrative Intelligence?

State Actor Involvement

Our analysis identified apparent state involvement across multiple narratives. Indian government accounts directly participated in the Operation Sindoor justification narrative, while state supporters appeared prominently in the Pakistan terrorist state and Kashmir territorial narratives.

Pakistan-based state actors showed more limited direct engagement but appeared to support counter-narratives through proxies and macro-influencers. This asymmetric approach reflects the differing digital influence strategies employed by the two states.

Third-party state supporters, particularly accounts previously identified as Russian state supporters, appeared in the war escalation narrative, suggesting a potential interest in amplifying messaging related to regional instability.

The Way Forward: Three Takeaways for Organization Leaders

• Recognize Information Battlespace Preparation
  Organizations must understand that modern conflicts feature digital campaigns before, during, and after physical operations. These narrative campaigns aim to influence public opinion, garner an international response, and shape diplomatic positioning. Adequate security now requires monitoring narrative development alongside traditional threat intelligence.
• Develop Narrative Resilience Strategies
  Organizations operating internationally require narrative intelligence to gain a comprehensive understanding of coordinated information operations. Companies face reputation risks from unintentional amplification when caught between competing state narratives and develop clear protocols for corporate communications during times of geopolitical tension to maintain neutrality while ensuring operational security.
• Invest in Narrative Authentication Technologies
  Organizations must strengthen narrative authentication practices as bot networks and coordinated campaigns become more sophisticated. They must implement tools to verify the origins of information before incorporating it into decision-making. They must also train teams to recognize markers of synthetic consensus and artificially amplified narratives that may influence market perceptions or stakeholder expectations.

The information warfare surrounding Operation Sindoor demonstrates how military actions now trigger parallel digital campaigns. These operations shape international perception, escalate or de-escalate tensions, and impact organizational interests across sectors. The organizations that best understand this digital battlefield gain critical advantages in navigating complex global environments.

• To receive a complimentary copy of The Forrester External Threat Intelligence Landscape 2025 Report, visit here.
• To learn more about how Blackbird.AI can help you in these situations, book a demo.